S. in the 84 (interpreting Identity VII “excessive difficulty” standard), with 42 You
Evaluate Hardison, 432 U.S.C. § 12111(10)(A) (defining ADA “unnecessary adversity” standard). Note: Individuals condition and you will local laws continue past Name VII with regards to of one’s protected basics safeguarded, the fresh discrimination prohibited, the latest accommodation required, in addition to judge criteria and you will protections you to definitely incorporate.
Ct
Discover, elizabeth.grams., Cooper v. Gen. Fictional character, Convair Aerospace Div., 533 F.2d 163, 168 (5th Cir. 1976) (saying “the forms and regions of faith, however peculiar, are protected”).
This preferred components comes on seminal Ultimate Legal conclusion interpreting the brand new conscience exclusion regarding the Armed forces Choosy Service Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3806(j). Discover, age.grams., Redmond v. GAF Corp., 574 F.2d 897, 901 letter.twelve (seventh Cir. 1978) (“We believe the right try to be placed on new devotion of what actually is ‘religious’ lower than § 2000e(j) is going to be based on this new Best Court choices for the Welsh v. You, 398 U.S. 333 (1970), and You v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1969), we.age., (1) is the ‘belief’ by which safeguards is sought for ‘religious’ for the person’s individual design away from something, and you can (2) could it possibly be ‘really held.’” (quoting people choices)) ; Fallon v.